Home

Resourcing

Consulting

Networking

Training

About NLM

Where to Find What

Products

Contact Us

Subscribe

The River:
Questions & Answers on the Process
of Starting a New Worship Service

This page last updated on 12/31/2007

by Ronald W. Waters

Read my blog on what has happened thus far and links to related pages

Question: How did you arrive at the decision to start a second service?

Answer:  When I was called to the Hammond Avenue Brethren Church just over two years ago, one of the highest concerns was finding ways to enrich the worship. My concerns about worship were greater than just enriching the service.  Certainly, I wanted to be sure our worship brought honor and glory to God while at the same time lifting the congregation into God's presence.

But my heart was to reach people in the community, not just serve ourselves. We have so many in this community who are unchurched and, worse, unsaved.  And though we were not at the capacity of our worship center, we couldn't grow much larger in our average attendance without expanding our seating some way.  So starting a second service (vs. building or starting a new church elsewhere) seemed to be the best and most cost effective approach.  New people are more readily attracted to something that is new (such as a new worship service or a new Sunday school class or a new choir, etc) than to something that already exists and is ongoing.

And as a congregation, our evangelism efforts were not strong—everyone believes so much in evangelism that we think we've already done it!  A new service seemed like a good way to help move us forward in our outreach.

 

Question: What process did you follow to introduce the idea of a second service?

Answer: In January 2003, after prayer for God's guidance and courage to step out in faith, I challenged our board and commissions with the vision of beginning a second service by fall 2003 or spring 2004.

The board and commissions accepted the challenge without a vote (I simply did not ask them to vote, so they never thought about it).  They have worked very hard to make the preparations.  The only thing that really slowed us up from starting in the fall of 2003 was that we had not yet been able to assemble all the instruments we wanted in the praise team.

The delay also proved beneficial financially. We had been expecting the proceeds from a bequest for several years but it kept getting delayed. But last fall we finally got the distribution. Some of the money had already been spent on new windows for the church and parsonage. But the board agreed to allocate the remaining $12,000 for launching the new service. So we did not have any real financial hardship to our ongoing budget in upgrading the sound system, doing the necessary newspaper advertising, or buying the instruments we were lacking. (We had previously purchased and installed a video projection system in June 2002 and have been projecting our hymns on the screen since then.  This has had the added benefit of improving our singing—people no longer had their faces buried in the hymnal but were able to lift up their eyes and their voices in song at the same time.)

Since we were not ready to begin the new service last fall, we did a small direct mail effort called Our Jerusalem (http://www.newlifeministries-nlm.org/ideas/our_jeru.htm). While we did not realize a lot of visible fruit from this program, it did help our people identify friends and relatives who are unsaved and/or unchurched.  It was helpful in preparing the way for this larger outreach effort.

One of the biggest challenges was deciding how to change our schedule. Our worship and Christian education commissions wrestled with the question for a long time.  We are very committed to Sunday school as a place to study God's Word together and build relationships with other believers in the process. So starting the new service on Saturday night seemed out of the question (we're just not strong enough numerically to staff a complete second "Sunday" school on Saturday night. Nor is our small group ministry strong enough to provide an alternative to Sunday school.

We considered two options (with many variations): 1) worship, Sunday school, worship (which is what we settled on); or 2) worship/Sunday school (all ages) running concurrently, followed by worship/Sunday school (adults)/children's church. The latter had a lot to commend it and I believe would have been easier to staff than the former. But conceptually, it just seemed like it would be hard to explain to our people. We may eventually go to that approach, but not yet.

 

Question: For whom are you targeting the new service?

Answer: We are targeting the new service for the unchurched, generally in the 18-55 age group (though everyone is welcome). We also hope to build attendance at our 8:30 traditional service. So far, we have emphasized word-of-mouth and personal invitations to unchurched friends and relatives.

 

Question: Describe the worship styles and types of music you are using.

Answer: Our single worship service has been blended for several years.  In the last year or so, we have introduced more of the praise and worship songs in addition to the praise choruses we had used before. We've used the iWorship DVDs to introduce and sing some of these songs.

We formed a new worship team which includes a praise band (piano, keyboard, acoustic & electric guitars, electric bass, and electronic drums). We had preview services on Jan 25 and Feb 22, plus on several Sundays since October the band played for one or two songs.

We did a "practice run" our new schedule (8:30 am Traditional Worship, 9:30 am Fellowship Time, 9:45 am Bible Fellowships/Sunday School, and 10:45 am The River—Contemporary Worship), on Mar 7, without advertising it to the public.  This gave us all an opportunity to make the change to that new schedule before we had guests join us the next week for our public launch. The 8:30 service became our traditional worship, returning to more of what our worship service was like a year or so ago, with more hymns and a few praise choruses and with piano and organ accompaniment.  We will still occasionally use DVDs and other media.  The 10:45 service was our third preview of the new style—mostly songs in the praise & worship genre, with occasional hymns played with a different beat.  We've found a great web site that provides hymn charts for praise bands (www.hymnchartslite.com), and it has been a great asset.

The River publicly debuted on Mar 14 following an extensive media campaign.  We also formed an extensive First Impressions Team to welcome and follow-up on guests.

The Sunday after the second full preview service, we asked people to indicate which worship service they were either definitely planning to attend or leaning toward.  The breakdown of people indicating one or the other service was about 40% traditional, 60% contemporary, with quite a few still indicating they are unsure or indicating they will attend both. That was about the breakdown on Mar 7 when we started the new schedule and before we had publicly announced the new service.

 

Question: How did you promote the new service?

Answer

 

Question: Why do you call your new service "The River"?

Answer: We wanted to give it a distinctive name. We use John 7:37-38 (especially from The Message) as the basis. Jesus says, “If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink. Rivers of living water will brim and spill out of the depths of anyone who believes in me this way, just as the Scripture says."  We believe Jesus is that River who gives eternal life to all who put their full faith and trust in him and who spills out of our lives.

Of course, there are many references to "rivers" in the Bible, so it seemed like a rich metaphor.  Also, there are a lot of songs about rivers.  We sort of adopted as our theme song "The River Is Here" because it is lively and it talks about the spiritual benefits of coming to the River of life—Jesus. 

We also were open to giving a name to our worship team.  One member suggested "Dry Gulch Creek," but we weren't sure that really conveyed the image we wanted. Then our moderator suggested "River's Edge" and it has stuck.  We also got matching polo shirts with the River logo and the church name on them.

Not really a reason for selecting the name, but it has a local connection as well—Waterloo is located on the Cedar River and the area is sometimes referred to as the Greater Cedar Valley.

 

Read my blog on what has happened thus far and links to related pages.

If you'd like to draw on some other resources on starting new services, we have some online at New Life Ministries at
http://www.newlifeministries-nlm.org/online/faqs.htm#Worship .

One of the best printed resources is a book by W. Charles Arn, How to Start a New Service, also available from New Life Ministries (http://www.newlifeministries-nlm.org/products/new_service.htm) or through your local bookstore.

And visit our church web site at http://hammondavenuebrethren.com.

 

 

 2000-2010 New Life Ministries (www.NewLifeMinistries-NLM.org). All Rights Reserved.
(see information on our copyright policy)

Top of Page